Interesting and thought provoking reading
Stansbury,
M. (2008, March 6). Analysis: how multimedia can improve learning. Retrieved
from http://www.eschoolnews.com/2008/03/26/analysis-how-multimedia-can-improve-learning
This
article was very interesting and gave me food for thought. The point Stansbury (2008) makes is that
research has shown that the use of multimedia certainly improves learning for
many students. Although it would appear
that the most learning occurs when students work individually if working with
simulations or equivalent. Also she
refers to sensory input "...Therefore, the more sensory input there is, the greater the
risk of overload–and the greater the risk of leaving information out of
long-term memory." What does this
mean for group work, where the sensory input could be extremely high,
overhearing over groups chatting etc? So
many ideas being discussed at once, more facial expressions, body language etc
to absorb???
I couldn’t help but
think about the contradiction of this article with my knowledge of the research
regarding groupwork. So now I feel there (I wish I had more time) is a need to
do further research regarding (face-to-face) groupwork and on-line collaborative
tasks.
"When students shift from non-interactive multimodal to interactive
multimodal learning (such as engagement in simulations, modeling, and
real-world experiences–most often in collaborative teams or groups), results
are not quite as high, with average gains at 9 percentiles." [compared to
non-interactive multimodal learning].
She notes that
pictures and text need to be presented simultaneously. (Temporal Contiguity
Principle)
Students learn best
when all 'extraneous' words, pictures and sounds are removed. (Coherence Principle)
On the whole I found
myself a little confused by some of the information in this article, I feel she
is saying let the 'media', be it books, online etc teach for itself, by keeping
pedagogy separate and that ultimately multimedia is good when students work
individually.
Would love to hear
someone else's opinion on this article.
No comments:
Post a Comment